WDIS AI-ML
5 min read
Protecting Sensitive Data in the Age of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Written by
Vinay Roy
Published on
29th Aug 2024

A common concern we have heard among the senior leaders of early or mid-stage companies is how to safeguard against leaking sensitive PII data while allowing their employees to use LLM models and other 3rd party AI tools. According to a survey, 71% of Senior IT leaders hesitate to adopt Generative AI due to security and privacy risks.

A closely related challenge is figuring out how to safely integrate LLMs into enterprise workflows—where models can support operations and decision-making—without compromising on privacy, compliance, or data governance. Leaders are increasingly looking for practical deployment models that balance AI capabilities with strict safeguards against inadvertent data leakage.

In this article, we will outline a practical, security-conscious approach to adopting AI in the enterprise. Our goal is to equip leaders with trusted strategies and proven technologies for deploying AI solutions that not only enhance productivity and decision-making but also safeguard sensitive data, preserve compliance, and earn the confidence of internal stakeholders and regulators alike. We will also highlight how these approaches align with widely accepted frameworks and standards such as SOC 2, HIPAA, and GDPR—giving your organization the foundation to innovate responsibly and with confidence.

Importantly, not every technique or tool covered in this article needs to be implemented all at once. Depending on the sensitivity of your data and the maturity of your internal capabilities, you can selectively adopt the measures most appropriate to your context—starting small and evolving your AI governance as your needs and resources grow.

What is the risk?

Many business leaders are unaware of the risk associated with the unregulated usaged of AI tools. So let us first understand the risk.

In March 2023, Economist reported 3 separate data leakage incidents by Samsung employees just after the company allowed their employees to use ChatGPT. OpenAI in its FAQ shares that any information shared by users can be used for re-raining future models. Open AI also states in its ChatGPT usage guide ‘Do not enter sensitive information.’

This is not the only incident. There have been a growing number of concerns and incidents related to data security and privacy with large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. Here are a couple of cases that illustrate similar issues:

1. Doctor-Patient Data Breach with Medical LLM: A news report (source might be difficult to find due to privacy concerns) highlighted a potential data breach involving a medical LLM used in a healthcare setting. A doctor reportedly used the LLM to analyze patient data and generate reports. There are concerns that the doctor might have inadvertently included identifiable patient information in the queries submitted to the LLM.

2. AI Bias in Hiring Decisions: This isn’t a data leak, but it demonstrates a potential risk associated with using LLMs in tasks involving sensitive information. There have been reports of AI recruiting tools using biased language models, leading to discriminatory hiring practices. The language models might pick up on subtle biases present in the training data, leading to unfair evaluation of candidates. While not directly a data leak, it showcases how LLMs can perpetuate biases or make discriminatory decisions based on the data they are trained on. This is a concern when using LLMs for tasks involving sensitive information like job applications or loan approvals.

Overall:

These incidents highlight the evolving landscape of data security and privacy in the age of LLMs. Here are some key takeaways:

  • LLMs are powerful tools, but require caution: They can be incredibly useful, but it’s crucial to be mindful of the data they are exposed to, especially when dealing with confidential or sensitive information.
  • User awareness is critical: Educating users about the potential risks and best practices for using LLMs is essential. Users should be aware of what data they are sharing and how it might be used.
  • Need for robust security protocols: Developers and organizations using LLMs need to implement robust security protocols to minimize the risk of data leaks or misuse.

As LLMs become more integrated into our lives, addressing these concerns will be crucial for ensuring responsible and ethical use of this powerful technology.

How to manage the risk?

To avoid this, some organizations have restricted their employees from using AI tools. This, in my opinion, is more harmful than helpful. Instead what we need is to evaluate the specific needs of an organization, the kind of information/task that these tools are helping achieve, and explore some ways in which a secured and controlled environment can be created for the safe use of AI tools. This approach ensures that the benefits of AI are harnessed without compromising security or confidentiality. It involves implementing robust security protocols, continuous monitoring, and regular training for employees on best practices and potential risks associated with AI tool usage. Below we will discuss some common methodologies:

Strategy 1: Create a robust AI Policy for your organization

This is where you should start. The AI Policy can be in addition to Third party / Open Source policy that the organization has. This process to creating an AI policy can be broken down into the following tasks:

  1. Assess Organizational Needs: Start by evaluating the specific needs and goals of your organization. Identify the tasks and processes where Gen AI or other AI tools can provide business / Professional / Personal value. Understand the type of data you will be working with and the potential risks involved.
  2. Define Acceptable Use: Clearly outline what constitutes acceptable use of Gen AI tools within your organization. This includes:
    Permitted Applications: Specify which tasks Gen AI can be used for, such as content creation, data analysis, etc. This will require creating a whitelist of allowed AI tools and also a blacklist of disallowed AI tools. Prohibited Usage: Identify uses that are not allowed, such as generating misleading information or content that violates company policies or laws.
  3. Compliance with Regulations: Ensure that the use of Gen AI tools complies with relevant regulations. This may include:
    GDPR: Protecting the personal data of EU citizens;
    CCPA: Ensuring the privacy rights of California residents.
    Other Local Laws: Adhering to local and industry-specific regulations. A huge concern emanates from PII and other company confidential data that we will discuss how to safeguard later in the article.
  4. Ethical Guidelines: Establish ethical guidelines for the use of Gen AI / Other AI tools. This includes:
    Transparency: Being transparent about when and how Gen AI is used. Bias Mitigation: Implementing measures to detect and mitigate biases in AI-generated content. Accountability: Holding individuals accountable for the misuse of AI tools.
  5. Monitoring and Auditing: Implement continuous monitoring and auditing processes to ensure compliance with the Gen AI policy. This involves
    Regular Audits: Conduct regular audits of AI tool usage and data handling.
    Incident Response: Having a clear incident response plan in case of data breaches or misuse of AI tools.
    Policy Review and Updates: Regularly review and update the AI policy to keep up with technological advancements and regulatory changes. This ensures that the policy remains relevant and effective.

While these policies are a good first start, one may have to look at 3rd party tools and Techniques that can provide additional guardrails.

Strategy 2: Enterprise SaaS LLMs That Promise Data Privacy

Another common strategy is to adopt enterprise-grade AI tools that explicitly commit not to use user data to train their models. These tools offer secure interfaces, enterprise SLAs, and usage policies that help mitigate risk.

Examples include:

  • Microsoft Copilot (with commercial data protection): Integrated into Microsoft 365, this version guarantees that your data won’t be used to train OpenAI’s models.
  • Google Vertex AI Search and Conversation: Offers enterprise-ready models with customizable access controls.
  • Anthropic Claude (Enterprise tier): Provides private deployments with no data retention by default.
  • OpenAI’s ChatGPT Team and Enterprise Plans: Claims to offer strict data isolation and disables training on submitted inputs.

Important Caveat:Even with these assurances, sensitive data is still processed by external servers, and organizations must place a high degree of trust in the provider’s claims. While these platforms are significantly safer than free-tier public AI tools, they still carry residual risk—especially if compliance or confidentiality is critical.

Strategy 3: Deploy Privacy Layers and Risk Mitigation Techniques

These techniques may involve - Data Minimization & Sandboxing, Anonymization & Tokenization, Automated Redaction Tools, User Training

Using a privacy layer to Sanitize private data

3.1. Data Minimization and Sandboxing:

  • Provide only the minimum data necessary: Don’t share more data with the LLM than is absolutely required for it to complete the task. This reduces the risk of exposing sensitive information inadvertently.
  • Sandbox environments: Consider using isolated environments, like sandboxes, to test and interact with LLMs. This can help prevent leaks from accidentally spreading to other parts of a system.

3.2. Data anonymization, Data Redaction, and Data Pseudonymization:

  • Anonymize sensitive data: If you must share sensitive data, explore techniques like anonymization or Tokenization. Anonymization removes personally identifiable information (PII) like names or addresses. Tokenization replaces sensitive data with random tokens that the LLM can understand but lack inherent meaning on their own.
  • Automated Redaction: Leveraging or implementing automated tools to identify and redact sensitive information from inputs before processing.
  • Pseudonymization: Replaces sensitive data with non-identifiable placeholders that maintain reference integrity.
  • Beware of re-identification risks: Even with anonymization, there might still be a risk of re-identification if other datasets can be used to link back to the original data.

3.3. User Training and Awareness:

  • Educate users: Train users who interact with LLMs about data security best practices. This includes understanding what information is safe to share and the potential risks involved. What helps with this is Regular workshops on AI ethics and best practices.
  • Clear guidelines and protocols: Establish clear guidelines and protocols for using LLMs, especially when dealing with sensitive data.

3.4. Model Training and Development:

  • Data cleaning and filtering: During LLM training, ensure the training data is cleaned and filtered to remove any sensitive information that could be leaked through the model.
  • Security audits and penetration testing: Regularly conduct security audits and penetration testing on LLMs to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.

3.5. Additional Techniques:

  • Access controls and monitoring: Implement strong access controls to restrict who can use LLMs and monitor their activity to detect suspicious behavior.
  • Encryption: Consider encrypting sensitive data before feeding it to the LLM for additional security.

Strategy 4: Private Deployment of LLMs on the Edge

For organizations managing highly sensitive data or operating in regulated industries, deploying Small Language Models (SLMs) on private infrastructure offers a secure and scalable alternative to cloud-based LLMs.

How it works: Rather than sending data to external servers, businesses can use on-premise or edge-based deployments of AI models, allowing full control over data access, processing, and retention. This eliminates the risk of third-party exposure while preserving the ability to leverage powerful generative capabilities. When done on-premise using SLMs, this architecture ensures none of your sensitive data leaves your internal environment—a major compliance and security benefit.

Core technologies in this stack include:

4.1. A platform for hosting and managing machine learning models locally or on private infrastructure. It allows you to run SLMs without exposing your data to external cloud services. Think of it as your secure model runtime engine.

4.2. An orchestration framework for building agents and LLM-based workflows. It enables RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) by combining LLMs with your own internal data sources in a controlled way. Helps in defining prompt flows, user queries, and managing memory across interactions.

4.3. An open-source vector database that stores and retrieves embeddings (numerical representations of data). When integrated with Langchain and an LLM, it allows you to build intelligent agents that can search across your private documents. All data retrieval and grounding happen locally—no cloud calls.

What this enables:

  • Enterprise RAG Pipelines: You can build agents that retrieve data from internal systems (e.g., support documents, contracts, financial data) and generate responses securely—tailored to your business.
  • Data Sovereignty & Privacy: All prompts, embeddings, and responses remain confined within your infrastructure, satisfying regulatory and governance requirements.
  • Context-Aware AI Assistants: Build intelligent copilots that are trained on your business context—without exposing sensitive information.
  • Auditability & Customization: Private deployments allow for complete logging, monitoring, and fine-tuning, enabling organizations to comply with security standards like SOC 2 or HIPAA.

This approach is ideal for organizations that want the power of LLMs—without the risk of leaking client data, trade secrets, or proprietary operations. It strikes the right balance between innovation and control.

Strategy 5: Technical Hardening and Access Controls

  • Model Auditing & Testing: Run penetration tests and data leakage assessments.
  • Access Management: Apply role-based access control (RBAC) and usage logging.
  • Encryption at Input & Output: For extra-sensitive contexts, encrypt data before LLM ingestion.

Summary: Build Smart, Use Responsibly

LLMs are powerful—but without governance, they’re also risky. The good news is that with thoughtful design, secure deployment, and organizational alignment, enterprises can enjoy the full power of AI without compromising on compliance, security, or trust.

If you’re unsure how to build a safe AI ecosystem for your team or want help deploying private AI models on the edge, we’re here to help. Reach out to NeutoAI—we specialize in making AI secure, scalable, and enterprise-ready.

As a photographer, it’s important to get the visuals right while establishing your online presence. Having a unique and professional portfolio will make you stand out to potential clients. The only problem? Most website builders out there offer cookie-cutter options — making lots of portfolios look the same.

That’s where a platform like Webflow comes to play. With Webflow you can either design and build a website from the ground up (without writing code) or start with a template that you can customize every aspect of. From unique animations and interactions to web app-like features, you have the opportunity to make your photography portfolio site stand out from the rest.

So, we put together a few photography portfolio websites that you can use yourself — whether you want to keep them the way they are or completely customize them to your liking.

12 photography portfolio websites to showcase your work

Here are 12 photography portfolio templates you can use with Webflow to create your own personal platform for showing off your work.

1. Jasmine

Stay Updated with Neuto AI Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our latest blogs, recommended digital courses, and more to unlock growth Mindset

Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
By clicking Subscribe, you agree to our Terms and Conditions
Data Science
Protecting Sensitive Data in the Age of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Vinay Roy
29th Aug 2024
Introduction
How to safeguard against leaking sensitive PII data while allowing their employees to use LLM models and other 3rd party AI tools.
Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

Protecting Sensitive Data in the Age of Large Language Models (LLMs)

A common concern we have heard among the senior leaders of early or mid-stage companies is how to safeguard against leaking sensitive PII data while allowing their employees to use LLM models and other 3rd party AI tools. According to a survey, 71% of Senior IT leaders hesitate to adopt Generative AI due to security and privacy risks.

A closely related challenge is figuring out how to safely integrate LLMs into enterprise workflows—where models can support operations and decision-making—without compromising on privacy, compliance, or data governance. Leaders are increasingly looking for practical deployment models that balance AI capabilities with strict safeguards against inadvertent data leakage.

In this article, we will outline a practical, security-conscious approach to adopting AI in the enterprise. Our goal is to equip leaders with trusted strategies and proven technologies for deploying AI solutions that not only enhance productivity and decision-making but also safeguard sensitive data, preserve compliance, and earn the confidence of internal stakeholders and regulators alike. We will also highlight how these approaches align with widely accepted frameworks and standards such as SOC 2, HIPAA, and GDPR—giving your organization the foundation to innovate responsibly and with confidence.

Importantly, not every technique or tool covered in this article needs to be implemented all at once. Depending on the sensitivity of your data and the maturity of your internal capabilities, you can selectively adopt the measures most appropriate to your context—starting small and evolving your AI governance as your needs and resources grow.

What is the risk?

Many business leaders are unaware of the risk associated with the unregulated usaged of AI tools. So let us first understand the risk.

In March 2023, Economist reported 3 separate data leakage incidents by Samsung employees just after the company allowed their employees to use ChatGPT. OpenAI in its FAQ shares that any information shared by users can be used for re-raining future models. Open AI also states in its ChatGPT usage guide ‘Do not enter sensitive information.’

This is not the only incident. There have been a growing number of concerns and incidents related to data security and privacy with large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. Here are a couple of cases that illustrate similar issues:

1. Doctor-Patient Data Breach with Medical LLM: A news report (source might be difficult to find due to privacy concerns) highlighted a potential data breach involving a medical LLM used in a healthcare setting. A doctor reportedly used the LLM to analyze patient data and generate reports. There are concerns that the doctor might have inadvertently included identifiable patient information in the queries submitted to the LLM.

2. AI Bias in Hiring Decisions: This isn’t a data leak, but it demonstrates a potential risk associated with using LLMs in tasks involving sensitive information. There have been reports of AI recruiting tools using biased language models, leading to discriminatory hiring practices. The language models might pick up on subtle biases present in the training data, leading to unfair evaluation of candidates. While not directly a data leak, it showcases how LLMs can perpetuate biases or make discriminatory decisions based on the data they are trained on. This is a concern when using LLMs for tasks involving sensitive information like job applications or loan approvals.

Overall:

These incidents highlight the evolving landscape of data security and privacy in the age of LLMs. Here are some key takeaways:

  • LLMs are powerful tools, but require caution: They can be incredibly useful, but it’s crucial to be mindful of the data they are exposed to, especially when dealing with confidential or sensitive information.
  • User awareness is critical: Educating users about the potential risks and best practices for using LLMs is essential. Users should be aware of what data they are sharing and how it might be used.
  • Need for robust security protocols: Developers and organizations using LLMs need to implement robust security protocols to minimize the risk of data leaks or misuse.

As LLMs become more integrated into our lives, addressing these concerns will be crucial for ensuring responsible and ethical use of this powerful technology.

How to manage the risk?

To avoid this, some organizations have restricted their employees from using AI tools. This, in my opinion, is more harmful than helpful. Instead what we need is to evaluate the specific needs of an organization, the kind of information/task that these tools are helping achieve, and explore some ways in which a secured and controlled environment can be created for the safe use of AI tools. This approach ensures that the benefits of AI are harnessed without compromising security or confidentiality. It involves implementing robust security protocols, continuous monitoring, and regular training for employees on best practices and potential risks associated with AI tool usage. Below we will discuss some common methodologies:

Strategy 1: Create a robust AI Policy for your organization

This is where you should start. The AI Policy can be in addition to Third party / Open Source policy that the organization has. This process to creating an AI policy can be broken down into the following tasks:

  1. Assess Organizational Needs: Start by evaluating the specific needs and goals of your organization. Identify the tasks and processes where Gen AI or other AI tools can provide business / Professional / Personal value. Understand the type of data you will be working with and the potential risks involved.
  2. Define Acceptable Use: Clearly outline what constitutes acceptable use of Gen AI tools within your organization. This includes:
    Permitted Applications: Specify which tasks Gen AI can be used for, such as content creation, data analysis, etc. This will require creating a whitelist of allowed AI tools and also a blacklist of disallowed AI tools. Prohibited Usage: Identify uses that are not allowed, such as generating misleading information or content that violates company policies or laws.
  3. Compliance with Regulations: Ensure that the use of Gen AI tools complies with relevant regulations. This may include:
    GDPR: Protecting the personal data of EU citizens;
    CCPA: Ensuring the privacy rights of California residents.
    Other Local Laws: Adhering to local and industry-specific regulations. A huge concern emanates from PII and other company confidential data that we will discuss how to safeguard later in the article.
  4. Ethical Guidelines: Establish ethical guidelines for the use of Gen AI / Other AI tools. This includes:
    Transparency: Being transparent about when and how Gen AI is used. Bias Mitigation: Implementing measures to detect and mitigate biases in AI-generated content. Accountability: Holding individuals accountable for the misuse of AI tools.
  5. Monitoring and Auditing: Implement continuous monitoring and auditing processes to ensure compliance with the Gen AI policy. This involves
    Regular Audits: Conduct regular audits of AI tool usage and data handling.
    Incident Response: Having a clear incident response plan in case of data breaches or misuse of AI tools.
    Policy Review and Updates: Regularly review and update the AI policy to keep up with technological advancements and regulatory changes. This ensures that the policy remains relevant and effective.

While these policies are a good first start, one may have to look at 3rd party tools and Techniques that can provide additional guardrails.

Strategy 2: Enterprise SaaS LLMs That Promise Data Privacy

Another common strategy is to adopt enterprise-grade AI tools that explicitly commit not to use user data to train their models. These tools offer secure interfaces, enterprise SLAs, and usage policies that help mitigate risk.

Examples include:

  • Microsoft Copilot (with commercial data protection): Integrated into Microsoft 365, this version guarantees that your data won’t be used to train OpenAI’s models.
  • Google Vertex AI Search and Conversation: Offers enterprise-ready models with customizable access controls.
  • Anthropic Claude (Enterprise tier): Provides private deployments with no data retention by default.
  • OpenAI’s ChatGPT Team and Enterprise Plans: Claims to offer strict data isolation and disables training on submitted inputs.

Important Caveat:Even with these assurances, sensitive data is still processed by external servers, and organizations must place a high degree of trust in the provider’s claims. While these platforms are significantly safer than free-tier public AI tools, they still carry residual risk—especially if compliance or confidentiality is critical.

Strategy 3: Deploy Privacy Layers and Risk Mitigation Techniques

These techniques may involve - Data Minimization & Sandboxing, Anonymization & Tokenization, Automated Redaction Tools, User Training

Using a privacy layer to Sanitize private data

3.1. Data Minimization and Sandboxing:

  • Provide only the minimum data necessary: Don’t share more data with the LLM than is absolutely required for it to complete the task. This reduces the risk of exposing sensitive information inadvertently.
  • Sandbox environments: Consider using isolated environments, like sandboxes, to test and interact with LLMs. This can help prevent leaks from accidentally spreading to other parts of a system.

3.2. Data anonymization, Data Redaction, and Data Pseudonymization:

  • Anonymize sensitive data: If you must share sensitive data, explore techniques like anonymization or Tokenization. Anonymization removes personally identifiable information (PII) like names or addresses. Tokenization replaces sensitive data with random tokens that the LLM can understand but lack inherent meaning on their own.
  • Automated Redaction: Leveraging or implementing automated tools to identify and redact sensitive information from inputs before processing.
  • Pseudonymization: Replaces sensitive data with non-identifiable placeholders that maintain reference integrity.
  • Beware of re-identification risks: Even with anonymization, there might still be a risk of re-identification if other datasets can be used to link back to the original data.

3.3. User Training and Awareness:

  • Educate users: Train users who interact with LLMs about data security best practices. This includes understanding what information is safe to share and the potential risks involved. What helps with this is Regular workshops on AI ethics and best practices.
  • Clear guidelines and protocols: Establish clear guidelines and protocols for using LLMs, especially when dealing with sensitive data.

3.4. Model Training and Development:

  • Data cleaning and filtering: During LLM training, ensure the training data is cleaned and filtered to remove any sensitive information that could be leaked through the model.
  • Security audits and penetration testing: Regularly conduct security audits and penetration testing on LLMs to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.

3.5. Additional Techniques:

  • Access controls and monitoring: Implement strong access controls to restrict who can use LLMs and monitor their activity to detect suspicious behavior.
  • Encryption: Consider encrypting sensitive data before feeding it to the LLM for additional security.

Strategy 4: Private Deployment of LLMs on the Edge

For organizations managing highly sensitive data or operating in regulated industries, deploying Small Language Models (SLMs) on private infrastructure offers a secure and scalable alternative to cloud-based LLMs.

How it works: Rather than sending data to external servers, businesses can use on-premise or edge-based deployments of AI models, allowing full control over data access, processing, and retention. This eliminates the risk of third-party exposure while preserving the ability to leverage powerful generative capabilities. When done on-premise using SLMs, this architecture ensures none of your sensitive data leaves your internal environment—a major compliance and security benefit.

Core technologies in this stack include:

4.1. A platform for hosting and managing machine learning models locally or on private infrastructure. It allows you to run SLMs without exposing your data to external cloud services. Think of it as your secure model runtime engine.

4.2. An orchestration framework for building agents and LLM-based workflows. It enables RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) by combining LLMs with your own internal data sources in a controlled way. Helps in defining prompt flows, user queries, and managing memory across interactions.

4.3. An open-source vector database that stores and retrieves embeddings (numerical representations of data). When integrated with Langchain and an LLM, it allows you to build intelligent agents that can search across your private documents. All data retrieval and grounding happen locally—no cloud calls.

What this enables:

  • Enterprise RAG Pipelines: You can build agents that retrieve data from internal systems (e.g., support documents, contracts, financial data) and generate responses securely—tailored to your business.
  • Data Sovereignty & Privacy: All prompts, embeddings, and responses remain confined within your infrastructure, satisfying regulatory and governance requirements.
  • Context-Aware AI Assistants: Build intelligent copilots that are trained on your business context—without exposing sensitive information.
  • Auditability & Customization: Private deployments allow for complete logging, monitoring, and fine-tuning, enabling organizations to comply with security standards like SOC 2 or HIPAA.

This approach is ideal for organizations that want the power of LLMs—without the risk of leaking client data, trade secrets, or proprietary operations. It strikes the right balance between innovation and control.

Strategy 5: Technical Hardening and Access Controls

  • Model Auditing & Testing: Run penetration tests and data leakage assessments.
  • Access Management: Apply role-based access control (RBAC) and usage logging.
  • Encryption at Input & Output: For extra-sensitive contexts, encrypt data before LLM ingestion.

Summary: Build Smart, Use Responsibly

LLMs are powerful—but without governance, they’re also risky. The good news is that with thoughtful design, secure deployment, and organizational alignment, enterprises can enjoy the full power of AI without compromising on compliance, security, or trust.

If you’re unsure how to build a safe AI ecosystem for your team or want help deploying private AI models on the edge, we’re here to help. Reach out to NeutoAI—we specialize in making AI secure, scalable, and enterprise-ready.

About the author:
Vinay Roy
Fractional AI / ML Strategist | ex-CPO | ex-Nvidia | ex-Apple | UC Berkeley
further readings
Related
Articles
Data Science
6 mins read
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for Modern B2B Visibility: An Actionable Guide
How to safeguard against leaking sensitive PII data while allowing their employees to use LLM models and other 3rd party AI tools.
Data Science
6 mins read
WDIS AI-ML Series: Module 2 Lesson 6: Model Selection and Evaluation Metrics
In most practical applications, data scientists often have a set of ML models that can be applied to solve a problem. Data scientists run a set of ML models and see which ones perform the best. This is called Racing ML models against each other to choose a winner.
Data Science
6 mins read
NeutoAI CoMarketer - Marketing Meets AI with Adaptive Content Optimization (ACO) System
NeutoAI CoMarketer introduces Adaptive Content Optimization (ACO), seamlessly merging AI and marketing for dynamic, personalized campaigns.